<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dd-wrt vs Tomato</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/</link>
	<description>the sun, the moon, and everything in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 22:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Umair Abbasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Abbasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ryan for introducing me to Scrutinizer. I read up on their website the features and the amazing data that it produces. Its overwhelmingly the best netFlow &amp; sFlow analyzer I have ever seen. The single drawback is the requirement for a Windows PC. I am in the process of considering a VMWare ESX installation to host operating systems. I am still in the considering stage, but if I ever do decide to go ahead and build the system I certainly would love to have scrutinizer running on one of OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ryan for introducing me to Scrutinizer. I read up on their website the features and the amazing data that it produces. Its overwhelmingly the best netFlow &amp; sFlow analyzer I have ever seen. The single drawback is the requirement for a Windows PC. I am in the process of considering a VMWare ESX installation to host operating systems. I am still in the considering stage, but if I ever do decide to go ahead and build the system I certainly would love to have scrutinizer running on one of OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umair Abbasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Abbasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hi Mario,

I have just realized I am still running Version 1.23 on my router. I am really not planning on an upgrade since everything is working A-Okay and the new firmware has no significant features. Let us know if you do come up with a solution for your issue, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mario,</p>
<p>I have just realized I am still running Version 1.23 on my router. I am really not planning on an upgrade since everything is working A-Okay and the new firmware has no significant features. Let us know if you do come up with a solution for your issue, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umair Abbasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Abbasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Hi Mario,

You really have nothing to worry about there regarding the encryption message. From what I understand, I think you have turned on https authentication on Tomato and hence its using the https protocol to authenticate. I get the same message when I try logging in and haven&#039;t had any issues. 

Its interesting that the backups are working in Opera and not IE. I am an avid Mac user and haven&#039;t had used IE for the longest time. I will give it a shot when I get a chance and get back to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mario,</p>
<p>You really have nothing to worry about there regarding the encryption message. From what I understand, I think you have turned on https authentication on Tomato and hence its using the https protocol to authenticate. I get the same message when I try logging in and haven&#8217;t had any issues. </p>
<p>Its interesting that the backups are working in Opera and not IE. I am an avid Mac user and haven&#8217;t had used IE for the longest time. I will give it a shot when I get a chance and get back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Got it to work with Opera.

Should I worry about this:
(1) This site is using an outdated encryption method which is no longer classified as secure. It cannot sufficiently protect sensitive data. Do you wish to continue?
(2) The server is using a short public encryption key, which is not considered to be secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it to work with Opera.</p>
<p>Should I worry about this:<br />
(1) This site is using an outdated encryption method which is no longer classified as secure. It cannot sufficiently protect sensitive data. Do you wish to continue?<br />
(2) The server is using a short public encryption key, which is not considered to be secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t backup my config with Tomato 1.25 and ie.
Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t backup my config with Tomato 1.25 and ie.<br />
Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Scrutinizer with Tomato?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Scrutinizer with Tomato?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIO</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>BIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-29</guid>
		<description>If you like Tomato, you should try Victek&#039;s RAF version as well. IMO it is even better/faster than stock Tomato as it&#039;s optimized for high p2p load.

http://victek.is-a-geek.com/

http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/showthread.php?t=62248</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like Tomato, you should try Victek&#8217;s RAF version as well. IMO it is even better/faster than stock Tomato as it&#8217;s optimized for high p2p load.</p>
<p><a href="http://victek.is-a-geek.com/" rel="nofollow">http://victek.is-a-geek.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/showthread.php?t=62248" rel="nofollow">http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/showthread.php?t=62248</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Well, I have to say, I was a dd-wrt guy ! till last week where an ebay - just bought - wrt54G V2 had issues with dd-wrt : the routeur refused to start after  each powe off / on, I had to press the init button each time, no possibility to configure something in these conditions, in addition after some minutes the routeur just stopped .  after hours, I even opened the routeur to check inside, I tried tomato after reading your post.

I am a tomato guy now. I did configure the bridge I wanted in no time.  WOW.  and it&#039;s working well.

thks for the good job done. It&#039;s working as expected !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have to say, I was a dd-wrt guy ! till last week where an ebay &#8211; just bought &#8211; wrt54G V2 had issues with dd-wrt : the routeur refused to start after  each powe off / on, I had to press the init button each time, no possibility to configure something in these conditions, in addition after some minutes the routeur just stopped .  after hours, I even opened the routeur to check inside, I tried tomato after reading your post.</p>
<p>I am a tomato guy now. I did configure the bridge I wanted in no time.  WOW.  and it&#8217;s working well.</p>
<p>thks for the good job done. It&#8217;s working as expected !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyCoolBackgrounds</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>MyCoolBackgrounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I will agree with you. I&#039;ve used DD-WRT for many years and it is a great firmware. However, as of late, I have been using Tomato more and more and have REALLY been liking it! Very solid and the user interfact with Ajax is AWESOME!

Definitely a keeper in my book. Just today I did a WDS installation in a 7,000 sq/ft house with several WRT54GLs.

Nice post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will agree with you. I&#8217;ve used DD-WRT for many years and it is a great firmware. However, as of late, I have been using Tomato more and more and have REALLY been liking it! Very solid and the user interfact with Ajax is AWESOME!</p>
<p>Definitely a keeper in my book. Just today I did a WDS installation in a 7,000 sq/ft house with several WRT54GLs.</p>
<p>Nice post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
