<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dd-wrt vs Tomato</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/</link>
	<description>the sun, the moon, and everything in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-338</guid>
		<description>hi. I am just downloading Scrutinizer. Is there any documentation showing how to use it with tomato or is it a no brainer? 
 
thanks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi. I am just downloading Scrutinizer. Is there any documentation showing how to use it with tomato or is it a no brainer? </p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Binderup</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Binderup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-337</guid>
		<description>I have also switched from dd-wrt to tomato and I like it (on a WNR3500L). 
 
The main reason why I did change was to see if Tomato behaved better with my iPhones and iPods but sadly it did not. I have an Airport Extreme that I would like to run on the 5GHz band and then the WNR3500L on the 2.4GHz band. But neither dd-wrt or tomato was able to keep a stable connection for the iPhone/iPod - though Tomato kept the connection longer than dd-wrt did. 
 
So I&#039;m back to the 2.4GHz band on my Airport Extreme and that is rock solid on WIFI. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also switched from dd-wrt to tomato and I like it (on a WNR3500L). </p>
<p>The main reason why I did change was to see if Tomato behaved better with my iPhones and iPods but sadly it did not. I have an Airport Extreme that I would like to run on the 5GHz band and then the WNR3500L on the 2.4GHz band. But neither dd-wrt or tomato was able to keep a stable connection for the iPhone/iPod &#8211; though Tomato kept the connection longer than dd-wrt did. </p>
<p>So I&#039;m back to the 2.4GHz band on my Airport Extreme and that is rock solid on WIFI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fourfridays</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>fourfridays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-334</guid>
		<description>I know. It just keeps chugging along. I know it&#039;s only been two days for you, but I guarantee you this firmware is rock solid. It just doesn&#039;t die. I have really pushed it to the limits in terms of network activity and it just goes, that&#039;s all you got for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know. It just keeps chugging along. I know it&#039;s only been two days for you, but I guarantee you this firmware is rock solid. It just doesn&#039;t die. I have really pushed it to the limits in terms of network activity and it just goes, that&#039;s all you got for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was also a DD-WRTer. I wanted to like DD-WRT, it just seems way &quot;cooler&quot; and I liked the tabs. But Tomato takes the cake. Its faster and more efficient. So far its been running for two days without any hiccups as you put it. Currently using a Netgear WNR3500L and using the latest tomato firmware from myopenrouter.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was also a DD-WRTer. I wanted to like DD-WRT, it just seems way &quot;cooler&quot; and I liked the tabs. But Tomato takes the cake. Its faster and more efficient. So far its been running for two days without any hiccups as you put it. Currently using a Netgear WNR3500L and using the latest tomato firmware from myopenrouter.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umair Abbasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Abbasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ryan for introducing me to Scrutinizer. I read up on their website the features and the amazing data that it produces. Its overwhelmingly the best netFlow &amp; sFlow analyzer I have ever seen. The single drawback is the requirement for a Windows PC. I am in the process of considering a VMWare ESX installation to host operating systems. I am still in the considering stage, but if I ever do decide to go ahead and build the system I certainly would love to have scrutinizer running on one of OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ryan for introducing me to Scrutinizer. I read up on their website the features and the amazing data that it produces. Its overwhelmingly the best netFlow &amp; sFlow analyzer I have ever seen. The single drawback is the requirement for a Windows PC. I am in the process of considering a VMWare ESX installation to host operating systems. I am still in the considering stage, but if I ever do decide to go ahead and build the system I certainly would love to have scrutinizer running on one of OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umair Abbasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Abbasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hi Mario,

I have just realized I am still running Version 1.23 on my router. I am really not planning on an upgrade since everything is working A-Okay and the new firmware has no significant features. Let us know if you do come up with a solution for your issue, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mario,</p>
<p>I have just realized I am still running Version 1.23 on my router. I am really not planning on an upgrade since everything is working A-Okay and the new firmware has no significant features. Let us know if you do come up with a solution for your issue, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umair Abbasi</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Abbasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Hi Mario,

You really have nothing to worry about there regarding the encryption message. From what I understand, I think you have turned on https authentication on Tomato and hence its using the https protocol to authenticate. I get the same message when I try logging in and haven&#039;t had any issues. 

Its interesting that the backups are working in Opera and not IE. I am an avid Mac user and haven&#039;t had used IE for the longest time. I will give it a shot when I get a chance and get back to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mario,</p>
<p>You really have nothing to worry about there regarding the encryption message. From what I understand, I think you have turned on https authentication on Tomato and hence its using the https protocol to authenticate. I get the same message when I try logging in and haven&#8217;t had any issues. </p>
<p>Its interesting that the backups are working in Opera and not IE. I am an avid Mac user and haven&#8217;t had used IE for the longest time. I will give it a shot when I get a chance and get back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Got it to work with Opera.

Should I worry about this:
(1) This site is using an outdated encryption method which is no longer classified as secure. It cannot sufficiently protect sensitive data. Do you wish to continue?
(2) The server is using a short public encryption key, which is not considered to be secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it to work with Opera.</p>
<p>Should I worry about this:<br />
(1) This site is using an outdated encryption method which is no longer classified as secure. It cannot sufficiently protect sensitive data. Do you wish to continue?<br />
(2) The server is using a short public encryption key, which is not considered to be secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t backup my config with Tomato 1.25 and ie.
Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t backup my config with Tomato 1.25 and ie.<br />
Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.fourfridays.com/2009/03/01/ddwrt-vs-tomato/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fourfridays.com/?p=45#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Scrutinizer with Tomato?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Scrutinizer with Tomato?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

